Beauty Contests Are Harmful

The old saying goes, peach tree is in the eye of the beholder. In other words, some one and only(a) or something that is considered attractive to one psyche may non necessarily appeal to another. If we lived in a perfect conception, possibly everyone would follow the wise words of this old saying and admit that evaluating beauty is a subjective practice. However society that does exist feels some streng thereforeed compulsion to turn every opinion of peoples lives into a aspiration. In my opinion, the prize of smasher Queen in one competition society could live without. apricot contests are an unnecessary element in society simply because they set phantasmagorical beauty standards for an audience of soft influenced girlish girls, they encourage judging on appearance, rather than on a persons character, and mainly because they disapproveify women. Beauty contests are well promoted by the media, with television receiver and images, which influence young womens opinions on appearance. The participants of these contests are poor g overnment agency models for these girls as they set impractical torso weight, breast size and consume skin standards. This sets an ideal female body, which only a minority of women offer realistic altogethery aspire.This adds pressure on all women to conform which brook then become incredibly harmful to young women by further dieting, alimentation dis prepares and cosmetic surgery, or simply making them feel inadequate and ugly. An article, name Thoughts about Miss Teen USA, out of a local American magazine was written by a young stripling in 2005, who had beneficial watched Miss Teen on NBC. Her recap of the contest was clean-living teeth. White teeth. Prom-style dress. Blonde. White teeth. Blonde. Chandelier earings. Tan. Blonde. Tan. Strapless gown. Followed by Thats all you need to knowThis certainly does not promote the contest in fact quite the contrary. The statement made by this young teenager is not one that is from a minority. She is one of thousands that view this as the average for a woman of beauty. It is not healthy for a young teen to think there is one type of beauty or one type of accepted body. It is harmful and could lead to both physical and aroused damage. Secondly, beauty contests further the belief that looks are superior to a persons abilities, feelings and heart. These women are judged wholly on the bases of physical appearance.The existence of talent barely does not work simply because an ugly person just wont win Judging women but not men, in the first place on their looks contributes to the subjugation of women because other qualities, much(prenominal) as intelligence, are not seen as part of ideal femininity and therefore not as things to which women should aspire. Miss USA 2002 went to a tall blonde ditzy Ohio woman, who was won over by the crowd when she made her statement that education was important and that you can tell if someone has an education by l ooking at them. The jeering in the statement being that beauty contests are not school and are not just based appearance.Beauty being seen as a high priority to men and women all over the world is harmful because it discourages women to be different and to show women are not just a pretty face. Lastly, beauty contests sanitaryly promote the negative aspect that women are seen as objects of sexual interest. These contests fail to challenge harmful political attitudes to women. They do nothing to aid the expiration of women, in fact by promoting looks as the most important feminine quality, they harm womens liberation in general. On the 17th of February the Campus National Organisation for Women protested the Miss UF Beauty Pageant.They handed out 300 protest flyers which stated their disgust with Florida dispirited Key and the University of Florida for holding a sexist pageant where women must be inspected in swimsuits and parade around in razeing gowns in order to be awarded s cholarship money. This shows how beauty contests encourage women to see themselves as an object (like a car) to be judged by men. Beauty contests hurt women by treating them as objects held up to a strict standard of beauty, a standard that is painful, time-consuming, and costly for women to try to achieve.In a high percentage of Hollywood films, even those in which the woman should be portrayed as a strong willed, independent heroine, usually feature women being played off solely as sex objects. Though there is nothing wrong with a woman being classified as sexy it should not be the entire package. One made of uniqueness, intelligence and charm is what should be promoted. Movies such as Lara Croft Tomb Raider and Charlies Angels, send the same message to the young men and woman, that beauty contests do, which is that only one kind of womens body is acceptable.This is harmful to a majority of women as beauty contests are encouraging men to treat them as an object rather than woman with opinions and uniqueness. Beauty contests are an unnecessary element in society because they set unrealistic beauty standards for an audience. There are contests out there, which attempt to create a judgment of well-balanced people. These sorts of competitions are trying to promote the intelligence tangled with beauty side, which should be heavily commended. However, contests in which beauty is emphasised as a solitary basis for winning, like beauty contests, are atrocious and harmful to society.